Project monitoring and evaluation (M&E) will be in accordance with established UNDP procedures and will carried out by the Project team, verified by the OPM and the UNDP Country Office in Samoa. Dedicated support by the technical adaptation teams in the UNDP Asia-Pacific Regional Center and UNDP New York will be provided on a regular basis. The Results Framework of the project defines success indicators for project implementation as well as the respective means of verification. A Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system for the project will be established, based on these indicators and means of verification. It is important to note that the Results Framework in Section F, including its indicators, targets and means of verification, will be reconfirmed during the inception phase of the project. Any changes to the Results Framework require approval by the Project Board.

Project Inception Workshop has been conducted within four months of project start up with the full project team, relevant government counterparts, national stakeholders, partners, and UNDP. The Inception Workshop is crucial to building ownership for project results and to plan the first year annual work plan. A fundamental objective of the Inception Workshop was to present the modalities of project implementation and execution, document mutual agreement for the proposed executive arrangements amongst stakeholders, and assist the project team to understand and take ownership of the project‘s goals and objectives. Another key objective of the Inception Workshop was to introduce the project team which will support the project during its implementation. An Inception Workshop Report has been prepared and shared with participants to formalize various agreements decided during the meeting.

A UNDP risk log will be regularly updated in intervals of no less than every six months in which critical risks to the project have been identified. Quarterly Progress Reports are prepared regularly by the Project team and verified by the Project Board. Annual Project Reports are prepared to monitor progress made since the beginning of the project and in particular for the previous reporting period. These annual reports include, but are not limited to, reporting on the following:

  • Progress made toward project objective and project outcomes – each with indicators, baseline data and end-of-project targets (cumulative);
  • Project outputs delivered per project Outcome (annual);
  • Lessons learned/good practices;
  • Annual expenditure reports;
  • Reporting on project risk management.

Government authorities, members of the Project Board and UNDP staff will conduct regular field visits to project sites based on the agreed schedule in the project’s Inception Report/Annual Work Plan to assess first hand project progress.

In terms of financial monitoring, the project team will provide UNDP with certified periodic financial statements. Audits on the project will follow UNDP finance regulations and rules and applicable audit policies. The Audit will be conducted in accordance with UNDP Financial Regulations and Rules and applicable audit policies on UNDP projects by a legally recognized auditor of the Government, or by a commercial auditor engaged by the Government. During project implementation, Annual Work Plans (AWP‘s) and Quarterly Work Plans (QWP‘s) will be used to refine project delivery targets and realign project work upon consultation and endorsement by the Project Board.

The project will undergo an independent Mid-Term Evaluation (MTE) at the mid- point of project implementation, which will determine progress being made toward the achievement of outcomes and identify course correction if needed. It will focus on the effectiveness, efficiency and timeliness of project implementation; highlight issues requiring decisions and actions; and present initial lessons learned about project design, implementation and management. Findings of this review will be incorporated as recommendations for the final half of the project‘s term. A summative terminal evaluation will be conducted 3 months before project closure.

Programme Monitoring and Evaluation Budget

Type of M&E activity Responsible Parties Budget US$

Excluding project team staff time

Time frame
Inception Workshop and Report §  Project Manager


Indicative cost:  $10,000 Within first two months of project start up
Measurement of Means of Verification of project results. §  UNDP CCA RTA/Project Manager will oversee the hiring of specific studies and institutions, and delegate responsibilities to relevant team members. To be finalized in Inception Phase and Workshop. Start, mid and end of project (during evaluation cycle) and annually when required.
Measurement of Means of Verification for Project Progress on output and implementation §  Oversight by Project Manager

§  Project team

To be determined as part of the Annual Work Plan preparation. Annually prior to ARR/PIR and to the definition of annual work plans
ARR/PIR §  Project manager and team




None Annually
Periodic status/ progress reports §  Project manager and team None Quarterly
Mid-term Evaluation §  Project manager and team



§  External Consultants (i.e. evaluation team)

Indicative cost:   $21,000 At the mid-point of project implementation.
Final Evaluation §  Project manager and team,



§  External Consultants (i.e. evaluation team)

Indicative cost :  $32,000 At least three months before the end of project implementation
Project Terminal Report §  Project manager and team


§  local consultant

None At least three months before the end of the project
Audit §  UNDP CO

§  Project manager and team

Indicative cost  : $13,000 Prior to mid term and final evaluations
Visits to field sites §  UNDP CO

§  UNDP RCU (as appropriate)

§  Government representatives

For AF supported projects, paid from IA fees and operational budget Yearly
TOTAL indicative COST

Excluding project team staff time and UNDP staff and travel expenses

 US$ 76,000


© 2020 MNRE All rights reserved.Website developed by ICT